8 July 2026.
A French public authority cannot remove a road from the public domain merely by adopting a declassification decision if the road remains, in practice, allocated to traffic or direct public use. France’s Conseil d’État has confirmed that declassification and discontinuance of public use are two separate steps.
Public use must end before declassification
The case concerned land adjoining a road in Courchevel. The municipality had formally recorded that several areas were no longer in public use and then declassified them with a view to a transfer connected with a hotel project. Some of the land included protective and retaining slopes that might remain inseparable from the public road.
The lower court treated the declassification decision as sufficient in itself to end public use. The Conseil d’État rejected that reasoning: on the date of declassification, the property must already have ceased to be allocated to a public service or to direct public use.
A factual change or a separate legal act
Discontinuance of public use may result from a factual situation — for example, a road being effectively closed to traffic — or from an act whose purpose or effect is to end that use. It cannot, however, be inferred automatically from the declassification decision alone.
The rule also applies to the public road domain. Exceptions include reclassification into another public authority’s road domain and, for a municipal road, conversion into a rural road.
Care is required before any disposal
A public authority wishing to transfer public-domain property must therefore establish that public use has genuinely and legally ended before declassification. Structures that remain necessary to a road still open to the public may undermine the transaction.
The judgment also explains that a merely temporary road closure for construction works does not necessarily require a prior public inquiry where access and traffic functions are not impaired. The Conseil d’État did not, however, decide the broader issue of anticipatory declassification in this case.
Read the Conseil d’État judgment of 6 July 2026 (No. 502005), its official case analysis and the public rapporteur’s submissions (in French).
Photograph: Julian Hochgesang / Unsplash.
The notarial office does not contractually guarantee the accuracy or currency of this information. For advice on how it applies to your circumstances, please consult one of the office’s notaries.
